Open Access
Publication ahead of print
Journal
Med Buccale Chir Buccale
Section Article original / Original article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2017015
Published online 01 November 2017
  1. Janakiraman EN, Alexander M, Sanjay P. Prospective analysis of frequency and contributing factors of nerve injuries following third-molar surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:784–786. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc 2007;73:325–327. [PubMed]
  3. Xu GZ, Yang C, Fan XD et al. Anatomic relationship between impacted third mandibular molar and the mandibular canal as the risk factor of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:e215–e 219. [CrossRef]
  4. Jerjes W, Upile T, Shah P et al. Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery-revisited. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:335–345. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hillerup S, Stoltze K. Lingual nerve injury in third molar surgery I. Observations on recovery of sensation with spontaneous healing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:884–889. [CrossRef]
  6. Rood JP. Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during the removal of impacted mandibular third molars: comparison of two methods of bone removal. Br Dent J 1992;172:108–110. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Leung YY, Cheung LK. Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: a literature review of prospective studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:1–10. [CrossRef]
  8. Bataineh AB. Sensory nerve impairment following mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1012–1017. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Brann CR, Brickley MR, Shepherd JP. Factors influencing nerve damage during lower third molar surgery. Br Dent J 1999;186:514–516. [PubMed]
  10. Eyrich G, Seifert B, Matthews F et al. 3-Dimensional imaging for lower third molars: is there an implication for surgical removal? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1867–1872. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Winter GB. Impacted mandibular third molars, St. Louis: Am Medical Book Co, 1926:241–279. [EDP Sciences]
  12. Pell GJ, Gregory BT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Digest 1933;39:330–338.
  13. Peterson LJ. Principles of management of impacted teeth. In: Peterson LJ, Ellis E III, Hupp JR, Tuker MR, Eds. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery, 3rd ed, St. Louis: Mosby, 1998:215–248.
  14. Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:291–302. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jung YH, Nah KS, Cho BH. Correlation of panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of a superimposed relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Imaging Sci Dent 2012;42:121–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hasegawa T, Ri S, Shigeta T, Akashi M et al. Risk factors associated with inferior alveolar nerve injury after extraction of the mandibular third molar-a comparative study of preoperative images by panoramic radiography and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:843–851. [CrossRef]
  17. Maglione M, Costantinides F, Bazzocchi G. Classification of impacted mandibular third molars on cone-beam CT images. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:e224–e231. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:114–119. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Monaco G, Montevecchi M, Bonetti GA, Gatto MR, Checchi L. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:312–318. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Maegawa H, Sano K, Kitagawa Y et al. Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:639–646. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mahasantipiya PM, Savage NW, Monsour PA, Wilson RJ. Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:154–163. [CrossRef]
  22. Öhman A, Kivijärvi K, Blombäck U, Flygare L. Preoperative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:e35.
  23. Chossegros C, Guyot L, Cheynet F, Belloni D, Blanc JL. Is lingual nerve protection necessary for lower third molar germectomy? A prospective study of 300 procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:620–624. [CrossRef]
  24. Tantanapornkul W, Okochi K, Bhakdinaronk A, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:11–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Bergé SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:964–971. [CrossRef]
  26. Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss WW Jr. Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1377 surgical procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100:185–192. [CrossRef]
  27. Rud J. Third molar surgery: relationship of root to mandibular canal and injuries to inferior alveolar dental nerve. Tandlaegebladet 1983;87:619–631. [PubMed]
  28. Sammartino G, Wang HL, Citarella R, Lepore M, Marenzi G. Analysis of occlusal stresses transmitted to the inferior alveolar nerve by multiple threaded implants. J Periodontol 2013;84:1655–1661.
  29. Nakamori K, Fujiwara K, Miyazaki A et al. Clinical assessment of the relationship between the third molar and the inferior alveolar canal using panoramic images and computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:2308–2313. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Monaco G, Montevecchi M, Bonetti GA, Gatto MR, Checchi L. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:312–318. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:253–259. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shiratori K, Nakamori K, Ueda M, Sonoda T, Dehari H. Assessment of the shape of the inferior alveolar canal as a marker for increased risk of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve at third molar surgery: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:2012–2019. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Park W, Choi JW, Kim JY, Kim BC, Kim HJ, Lee SH. Cortical integrity of the inferior alveolar canal as a predictor of paresthesia after third-molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:271–278. [CrossRef]
  34. de Melo Albert DG, Gomes AC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, de Oliveira e Silva ED, Holanda GZ. Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1030–1037. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nakayama K, Nonoyama M, Takaki Y et al. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2587–2591. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Leung YY, Cheung LK. Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: a literature review of prospective studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:1–10. [CrossRef]
  37. Sarikov R, Juodzbalys G. Inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar extraction: a literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2014;5:e1. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.